Disney thinks streaming service arbitration clause removes liability for Epcot patron's death 🤦

👉 Recording equipment used upstairs:
🔵 HDMI capture: https://amzn.to/4bcXEFL
🔵 Camera: https://amzn.to/3VVkSLW
🔵 Black AT4050 Microphone: https://amzn.to/4cAdkUi
🔵 Audio interface: https://amzn.to/3VuKihx
🔵 Bad mic stand for AT4050 mic: https://amzn.to/4ce9dxH https://amzn.to/3RJ3W93
🔵 Chair: https://amzn.to/4bgR6pw or https://amzn.to/3VGkiQO

TIMESTAMPS:

00:00 - Intro
01:18 - Forced arbitration introduction
01:38 - Consumer protection in the US is garbage
02:18 - Class actions result in extended warranties that force companies to be held accountable. Not always useless
04:00 - What is a _R_etroactively _A_mended _P_urchase _E_xperience?
09:35 - Why forced arbitration is legal in America
10:12 - The best comment I've ever received
10:41 - INTRODUCTION TO DISNEY STORY
11:28 - This is a perfect example of what SHOULD be taken to court!
11:45 - Regardless of whether you agree or disagree, this is for a court to decide.
12:30 - Signing up for Disney Plus streaming service was key to Disney's defensea
13:06 - These are different services. Example.
14:21 - Plaintiff's argument is disingenuous, underhanded, and wrong
16:20 - Facts & integrity are more important than road raging youtube videos.
16:53 - Plaintiff's INTERPRETATION of the Morgan declaration
17:18 - Morgan Declaration - the defense of Disney from Disney Manager
18:01 - Plaintiff's attorney is correct in THEORY, not in practice
19:29 - Plaintiff's attorney ACCEPTS THE PREMISE that plaintiff AGREED to subscriber agreement
20:10 - BINDING ARBITRATION WAS IN SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT THE ENTIRE TIME!
20:23 - Plaintiff's lawyer acted in bad faith, used logical fallacies, and was wrong
20:30 - Demonstration of plaintiff's lawyer's logical fallacy
21:35 - Plaintiff's attorney didn't even read the subscription agreement
22:44 - Luckily, none of this matters - Disney is still effed.
23:08 - What is "My Disney Experience" ?
23:37 - The terms for buying ticket to restaurant OVERRIDE disney terms of use & disney+ contract - CHECKMATE DISNEY!
24:00 - Disney's own terms say plaintiff can take Disney to court.
24:13 - LEGAL QUESTION: DOES THIS SUPERCEDE SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT IN DISNEY+ AS WELL?
24:30 - Law governing estates as separate entity from Mr. Piccolo renders all prior arguments pointless; CHECKMATE DISNEY!
25:35 - 90 second TL;DR
27:04 - 5 second TL;DR
27:09 - Forced arbitration should be illegal
28:09 - US politicans are a joke
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUO59pw3r6k